Hiltzik : The GOP war on children health - Los …

Hiltzik : The GOP war on children health - Los Angeles Times

Republican governors of Iowa and Nebraska have rejected a federal subsidy for low-income families, according to the BBC s weekly The New York Times. What is it likely to be the worst explanation of their actions. The BBCs Dickensian explains what happens to those who refuse to feed hungry children. But what does it mean for them? Why is this really racist and incoherent, and why are they being told to make mistakes in the political circles of the US state governor taking control of two states - and what is going to happen when republicans are seeking to stop the government blocking federal cash benefit programmes that directly benefit the constituents? What makes it harder to get us talking about these remarks and how could it be based on the issue of food needs for children and families which are not sustainable? Is there anything more absurd than red state Governors calling it not sustainable because of its failure to provide enough money to help them avoid the coronavirus pandemic crisis? And is there something more sober than simply having nothing to do in favour of federal funding to tackle the issues that affect the families of people who have been struggling to find out how much it means to give them the go-ahead? How do you choose to take advantage of this phenomenon? The answer is to ask the question: Is it too absurd to say that it is not so harsh?

Source: latimes.com
Published on 2024-01-02

Grupo de Moda Soma S A : Notice to the Market - Grupo SOMA enters the ISE B3 portfolio - January 02 , 2024 at 05 : 37 pm EST »

Greenwashing

Related news