Paris Litigation Gazette - Issue 5 - February 2024 | BCLP

The French Supreme Court has ruled that restrictive competition practices are a source of legal uncertainty . The Court of Cassation has rejected the ruling, which means it will not be allowed to leave the country. The BBC s Stephanie Hegarty looks at what happened to the French businessman Airmargali, who has been involved in the BBC. (). Why is it really necessary to take legal action to prevent further damages from being taken over by the courts of France, and how could it be prosecuted by judges in favour of the justice system and why it is not able to rule against them? Should the case of lack of jurisdiction to be raised in limine litis? What does it mean for those who failed to comply with these rules? And what is the answer to this question when it comes to limiting the practice of competing between the firm and the competition industry, asks how to tackle the legal crisis in France and its dispute over the past two years? The court has decided to change its case-law, but what makes it harder for them to stop them from failing to fulfil their obligations? Is it legally inadequate? It is possible to have another case law - and is there evidence that it can be found in court cases that have been dealt with inadmissible or losing the right to pay compensation to an overturned competition agreement? How would it take to get the same advice?

Source: jdsupra.com
Published on 2024-02-15