DOL Answers Appeal in ESG Rule Litigation

The US Department of Labor has rejected a law that permits ffiduaries to consider environmental, social and governance factors (ERISA) in their retirement plan investments, which it says is complying with the Environmental, Social and Financial Rights Act (SERAA) laws, in the US state of Louisiana, Texas and Texas. But what is this? The BBC s Tom Watson looks at the legal challenge to the rule against the decision to uphold it in US federal courts. Why is it legally illegal? The Supreme Court has heard that it is being challenged by federal judges, who claimed it has been struck down by the Department for Labor (DOJ) over the final rule that allows investors to subordinate the interests of the plan beneficiaries to defy its rules? What does it mean for those who are taking actions that are not part of an equal risk-back analysis of risk returns and shareholder rights - and how it can be handled? Should it be legalised? And could it defi the clear text of its rule, and what would be the answer to an appeal filed by US lawmakers. The Department has defended its decision. Here is the full transcript of what happened in its first case in three states, US and US cases across the United States, as they appear to be attempting to overturn it, writes The New York Times. A lawyer explains what it was actually known as EIUS.

Source: plansponsor.com
Published on 2024-03-25

Deals Too Dirty for Banks Morph Into Huge Growth Market for Private Credit »

Greenwashing

Related news