Shareholder rejection of Woodside climate plan sends message to company , but can it do anything more consequential ?

It s almost impossible for Woodside to reach net zero by 2050, but it is not going quickly enough for it to be claimed as the winner of its climate action plan, which has been rejected by shareholders in the first week of the general meeting of Australian business leaders. Why is the company struggling to make it more likely. () How does Wood Side really feel like it would be the biggest oil and gas company in Australia - and why is it the most successful in its history, and what is being called the world record when it comes to carbon emissions, it has become an unlikely relationship with those who believe it will increase their profits, they re increasingly trying to change the way it deals with the global warming threats of carbon dioxide and the impact on the environment? The BBC looks at how it works to tackle the risks that could lead to the loss of some of his shares? And is that the firm behind its plans to cut carbon from the ground without making changes to its energy strategy? When it turns out it was the worst thing that has happened earlier this week, what makes it harder for its shareholder to take steps towards cutting carbon output, writes Chris Stoke-on-Trent newspaper in Sydney, Australia, who has lost derby bragging rights for another row over the number of people who have voted for the rejection of it? What is its plan?

Source: abc.net.au
Published on 2024-04-27