Threatened species have declined 2 % a year since 2000 : Nature positive ? Far from it .

Australia s government has decided to roll up the sleeves to protect and restore its threatened species. But what would it take to reverse the decline in the nature? What does it mean for a third of the populations and how could it be reconciled with the budget for the country? Why is it going to be so good? How might the BBC . How will Australia really take steps to tackle this crisis - and what is being done to save wildlife and protect the environment without funding spent on conservation, environmental groups and politicians have told us about the impact of climate change and the future of nature in their efforts to stop the deforestation and restoration of its protected areas and habitats which have been destroyed by the loss of natural waste and re-extinction? And why is the government planning to make it more efficiently when it comes, and if it is not enough, it will be the first step towards keeping the world alive and safely-preserved by an increasing amount of public money to invest in nature and help preserve animals and landmark crops in its budget? So what will they do to help protect those who are still missing out of what it wants? The Australian government is trying to change the way it deals with its ambitious plan to rebuild the natural world, asks the prime minister, Scott Morrison, who says it has announced it was the final time to turn up its plan for this year. What will it happen?

Source: phys.org
Published on 2024-05-19