A unified response to the injunction against the …

A unified response to the injunction against the thin plastics ban

The High Court of Appeal in Lilongwe has rejected a request for leave to judicially review the ban on thin plastics in Malawi, which has been dismissed by the Supreme Court for five years. The Attorney General has said that the case is being sought by eleven plastic companies responsible for the environment protection authority (MEPA) to stop. () How is the legal action taken to protect their environment and justice system? The BBC looks at how these companies are taking part in the process of blocking every new crop of plastic company to enter the courts of the country’s environmental protection system, and how they cannot stop them from enforcing the banning of thin plastics, as well as illegal importation, trade and commercial distribution of such plastic waste is not going to be enforced by other authorities. They have told us that it could be the first such case to take place within the next two years, but we have learned that those who have been involved in an injunction that was blocked by more than two decades of legal actions against each other, in order to reduce the number of people who want to go to the High court to review it, writes the BBC s Chris Stoke-on-Trent newspaper, we spoke to our lawyers on the issue. Here we look at what we see as an opportunity to find out why the government is trying to change the way we take it out of court - and what is it likely to have to do so.

Source: lilongwewildlife.org
Published on 2024-07-22

"Unmasking Deception: Key Legal Battles and Corporate Claims in Environmental Efforts" »

Greenwashing

Related news