Deepsea mining conference spurs rare Cook Islands protest
Civil society groups in the Cook Islands have voiced concerns over the increasing involvement of seabed mineral companies in the nation, despite the potential economic benefits. The country, known for its pristine beaches and small population of 15,000, is hosting a conference on underwater minerals, signaling its interest in deepsea mining. However, not everyone is convinced that exploiting seabed resources, such as manganese and cobalt, is a wise decision. A demonstration in Avarua Harbour, featuring traditional vessels and a large sign reading Protect Our Ocean, #Think Deeply, was organized by three civil society organizations to show opposition to deepsea mining. They argue that the seafloor around the Cook Islands is rich in polymetallic nodules, which could potentially add billions to the economy if mined. However, skeptics warn that mining could cause irreparable damage to an environment that is still poorly understood. The Cook Islands government has issued exploration licenses to three seabed mining companies, but has not yet announced if or when mining will begin. Some Pacific island neighbors, like Nauru, are also interested in exploiting resources in international waters. Despite the potential economic benefits, Cook Islanders are concerned about the long-term impact of deepsea mining on their country s wealth and well-being. The country s tourism-reliant economy suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic, and leaders worry about remaining poor for the rest of their lives. Civil society organizations have expressed concerns about how deepsea mining companies have embedded themselves into Cook Island society, funding charitable trusts and sponsoring cultural events. They accuse these companies of greenwashing efforts to raise awareness about seabed minerals. In conclusion, while the Cook Islands is exploring the potential economic benefits of deepsea mining, there is significant opposition from civil society groups and some local leaders. They argue that more time is needed for research and discussion on the potential risks and threats to the environment and the country s long-term prosperity.
Source: globalsecurity.orgPublished on 2024-09-21
Related news
- COP26 Message to Companies Is Clear : Speed Up Your Net - Zero Plans
- Dont take greenwashing at face value , authors argue | The University of Kansas
- WPP : Greenpeace is right to protest but we will still work with energy clients | Advertising
- Construction Leader : Sammi Johnstone transition from zoology to surveying at Jones Hargreaves
- New market opportunity for ESG risk management solutions
- Going for woke : Companies treading a fine line on social licence
- Robin Powell : ESG investing needs easy rules now , regulators
- Climate statements take centre stage at Midwinter Ball in protest over oil and gas sponsorship
- Australian car industry secret emissions plan would slow drive toward electric vehicles
- Googling climate change ? You might see fossil fuel ads
- What at Stake at the COP26 Climate Summit ? Here a Guide to the Make - Or - Break Issues
- Factors other than making money to be considered in how NU invests funds
- INR 2 . 5 Cr funding won by Social Startups from IIITH social incubator AIC - IIITH
- Weave . AI Named to 2021 WealthTech100 List of Innovative Companies Transforming the Global Investment Industry
- COP27 : Everything you need to know about this year climate summit