The US Supreme Court has rejected a ruling that the agency cannot regulate carbon emissions from power plants. But what does this mean for environmental regulators, asks Tom de Castella, chief executive of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Source: theconversation.comPublished on 2022-07-01
Related news
- Working together on global supply chains can help prevent climate disaster
- Africa Day 2022 : Pan - African civil society pressures TotalEnergies to halt EACOP ( By Landry Ninteretse )
- ClimateTrade Adds Spain and Colombia Registries Onto Its Global Climate Platform in COP26 Announcement
- Volkswagen $125 million fine is a warning to all greenwashers
- SIX partners with Sustainalytics to deliver ESG regulatory data
- Equinor : Profitability on the Way to Net Zero … Starting Now !
- Brighter Super targets fund - wide carbon audit by Q3 | Asset Owners
- Big Oil CEOs Have a Personal Reason to Put More Focus on Less Fossil Fuels
- Africa Day 2022 : Pan - African Civil Society Pressures Totalen ...
- Flood of net zero vows suffer credibility gap : report
- Singapore Finance Taskforce Aids Industry in Climate Initiatives
- The Supreme Court has curtailed EPA power to regulate carbon pollution – and sent a warning to other regulators | Kiowa County Press
- Climate - Related Risk Heating Up Down Under | Jones Day
- The Supreme Court has curtailed EPA power to regulate carbon pollution – and sent a warning to other regulators
- How The World Top Holding Companies Are Celebrating Earth Day 2022